The European Parliament voted on Thursday to
drop all criminal charges against Edward Snowden and offer him asylum
and protection from rendition from third parties.
MEPs voted 285 - 281 to recognise the NSA whistleblower's status
as a "human rights defender" and asked member states to
grant him protection from extradition to the US, where he is wanted
under several Espionage Act charges.In the resolution that was
passed, MEPs said "too little has been done to safeguard
citizens' fundamental rights following revelations of electronic mass
surveillance" Snowden
Deliberately blanketing the skies with nanosized heavy metals
achieves at least two complementary goals, i.e. weather manipulation
and make people
brain dead.
Weather manipulation itself has two main objectives:
To simulate “climate change”
that will be used to institute “sustainable development” agenda
on a global scale previously branded as Agenda 21, now updated to
Agenda
2030 as will be announced later this month from the United
Nations General Assembly podium by Pope Bergoglio himself!
Deliberately reduces agricultural production to induce famine
and hunger in the Third World; raises food prices to keep Western
population in perpetual austerity.
Participants at press conference to
launch Synthesis Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC)
The 31st Session of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) opened this morning
in Bali, Indonesia. So, what’s wrong with sustainable development?
Isn’t it good for the planet?
Of course, it is. But what are the methods they are proposing to
achieve it?
Are they saying that it is high
time that we use non-polluting free energy technologies instead of
fossil fueled power plants?
Are they saying that cold fusion
will be used instead of the obsolete nuclear fusion technology?
No.
They want us to reduce carbon emissions by shutting down factories
and charge “carbon tax” to feed the greedy Corporatocracy even
more. But that’s not all.
The heavy metals they keep spraying are proven to be in accordance
with the overall goal of directly reducing the population that’s
been emitting much of the carbon dioxide according to the most ardent
population reduction through mass vaccination advocate, Bill Gates:
In order to achieve CO2 = 0, he needs to have P
= 0, because People require Services
that need Energy which produces Carbon
emission.
“Innovating to Zero” means zero population and the audience
did give him a thunderous applause when they finally understood what
the Gate’s formula is driving into.
But who will decide who lives and who dies?
The formula is also very simple: if you won’t do anything to
topple them from power, then you deserve to be eliminated indeed.
Remember the eugenics Darwinian dictum, “only the fittest
survives.”
Well, they are the fittest and they are in control because you,
the weakling, did nothing.
Your apathy or insouciance is your consent to all the crimes that
they have committed and will continue to do so while you remain
docile with aluminum intoxication.
So, now you understood why the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
is throwing billions on the United Nations’ mass vaccinations
program and the Gates software empire is also part owner of
Monsanto’s GMO conglomerate.
The myth about the “global warming”, now remarketed as
“climate change” after more than 30,000 geo scientists protested
and proven to be correct that global warming is a natural, cyclical
phenomenon and has nothing to do with carbon emission. The world
right now is in fact cooling.
Carbon is a necessary element for plants to grow. Plants, in
return, give off oxygen to complete the symbiosis between plants and
humans. That’s not to say that too much carbon is still not bad for
our health. The idea is to strike a balance which is not impossible
to do in this day and age.
But who are depleting the forest of its century old trees if not
the corporations which control governments around the world?
After they have created the problem by creating an imbalance in
our delicate planet, they are implementing a supposed solution which
does not eradicate the problem directly but only sought to eliminate
the real threat to their full dominion on this planet, i.e. the
useless eaters.
The other purpose of chemtrailing is to curtail the ability of the
population to think by destroying the human brain directly.
Deliberately putting nanosized aluminum into the air we breathe
avoids the need to convince people about the wisdom of injecting
adjuvant aluminum through mass vaccinations in order to inflict
cancer and brain disorder.
The sun is the real cause of global warming which peaked in the
earlier part of 2012 and 2014, and was truly good for the human
brain, i.e. it enhances the awakening even more. Probably the main
reason why they must block the sun rays from reaching the Sheeples
skulls at all cost.
Chemtrailing is also the only practical method remaining to arrest
the global wide mass awakening brought about by the internet. The
internet can’t be shut down without shutting down their fiat
financial infrastructure and their AI-based technocratic dictatorship
now exposed as the real intent of the Jade Helm operations.
No chemtrail aircraft could fly without the blessings of who’s
in power. The government’s denial about what the public could
readily see if they only raise their heads from time to time is,
therefore, more than just adding insult to their intellect on top of
the real injury inflicted upon their health. It’s a deliberate act
of mass genocide in a truly global scale.
We have already presented a chemtrail pilot’s web based
testimony through his trusted intermediaries. Now, we know about the
secretive Operation Skyfold.
Let it be understood that once an operation is exposed, another
label is used in its stead. Operation Skyfold is just one of those
chemtrail operations, and some of them already have been exposed in
the past.
We followed this Skyfold pilot’s revelation up with the
prominent mainstream scientist’s peer-reviewed publication about
coal fly ash as one of those possible deadly ingredients used with
chemtrailing operations.
This is obviously a major slap upon the chemtrail trolls’ face
but their willingness to go down the abyss of their limited and
inflexible intellect, or absence thereof, due perhaps to having
over-inhaled much of these aforementioned mind numbing chemicals,
they are now asserting that said scientist should show us the actual
chemtrail aircraft and so on and so forth, before they would believe
the peer-reviewed proofs.
But who cares if some segments in our society still believe that
their government is sincerely working for them and not the corporate
interest who funded the politicians’ scholarship and fellowship
programs, above average lifestyles and their subsequent political
campaigns?
To all them we say, keep subscribing to government talking heads
at your own peril. You, the skeptics are the ones suffering. People
at eClinik are enjoying healthcare
freedom for almost a decade now.
You know why?
Because we don’t need to open up every single hangar in this
country including those secretive small island bases just to prove
that chemtrail operations are part of a major government sanctioned
geo and social engineering programs.
We only need to open the books and follow the taxpayers’ money.
Exposed: Secret presidential chemtrail budget
uncovered – Congress exceeds billions to spray populace like
roaches
March 30, 2011 10:22 am EDT
The budget President Obama didn’t want you to
know about
By Shepard Ambellas & Avalon
(INTELLIHUB.COM) — Geoengineering has now been defined as: “the
deliberate large-scale manipulation of the planetary environment to
counteract anthropogenic
climate change.” – The
Royal Society 2009
Recently, the question has been asked, what in the world are they
spraying? The documentary with the same name answers many of those
questions.
However, the question the world is now asking is: who
in the world is spraying us? Now exposed in the new film
Shade the Motion Picture.
The world is now demanding accountability
As an introduction to this article we will first cover information
to familiarize the uninformed readers as to the core facts and
information so that a more complete understanding is possible given
this complex issue.
A report
by CBS Atlanta
details how some local citizens are outraged that such “crimes
against humanity” are being carried out right before our eyes in
secret.
In the report Sen. Johnny
Isakson was interviewed on the subject of chemtrails saying
quote: “That is a theory that some people have, but there is no
evidence this is happening. This is not happening.”
It looks as if members of the government’s upper echelon and
even members of the Senate will go to extreme lengths to suppress
this vital information from reaching the American people.
Not to mention they signed off on the multi-billion dollar per
year budgets during an economic crisis, giving little to no
transparency to the public.
Moreover, in regards to aerosol spraying into the earth’s
atmosphere, a recent update to data assembled by The
Carnicom Institute reveals the chemicals used and their
respective levels of concentration. The toxic levels that are being
used in these aerosols goes beyond shocking – it would appear that
these levels are indeed criminal by EPA
Standards.
By Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri
February 3, 2011 (Excerpt from Report)
A new preliminary draft report by ArizonaSkyWatch shows dramatic
increases in heavy metals that simply do not belong in our air. NOTE:
The level of Manganese is so shockingly high that ArizonaSkyWatch
also included additional information about it (see below). This
report will be posted online shortly. This is only a preliminary overview of Arizona Air
Particulates.
2010 Air Particulates These figures indicate how many times they are over the
allowable toxic limit: Aluminum: 15.8 Antimony: 63.3 Arsenic:
418
Barium:5.3
Cadmium:6.0
Chromium:6.4
Copper:9.0 Iron: 43.5 Lead: 15.7 Manganese: 513.8
Nickel:10.7
Zinc:7.5
Additional Research & Videos are at the CaliforniaSkyWatch.com
& the AgricultureDefenseCoalition.org.
Interestingly enough, Monsanto
has also released an Aluminum
Resistant Seed which is
Genetically Modified to tolerate Aluminum in high levels in the
soil. Is this a coincidence, or do they know something? “Control oil and you control nations; control food and
you control the people.” – Henry Kissinger
See also: Henry
Kissinger National Security Study Memorandum 200 “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a
new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the
threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would
fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and
it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be
overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” – Richard
Haass– Club of Rome Another famous quote: When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when
the government fears the people, there is liberty. Whenever the
people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own
government. –Thomas Jefferson
Purpose
The Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research
(FICER) exists to accelerate the innovative development and
evaluation of science and technology to address carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse gas emissions and their environmental consequences.
The non-profit research fund focuses on early-stage innovative
research where relatively small and timely grants can significantly
advance understanding, especially of the viability and scalability of
proposals to address global warming.
Funded research projects are intended to produce peer-reviewed
scholarly articles in recognized professional scientific and
technical journals. Any intellectual property that may be generated
in the course of such research resides with the researchers or their
institutions.
Grants for research are provided to the University of Calgary from
gifts made by Mr. Bill Gates from his personal funds.
The activities of the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy
Research fall outside the scope of activities of the Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation. FICER is not a Foundation project and has
no relationship with it.
The fund has supported research in a wide range of areas. Some
examples include:
understanding carbon dioxide
emissions associated with international trade in goods and services;
developing technologies to capture
carbon dioxide out of the air; and
climate modeling to understand possible environmental
consequences of solar radiation management.
Report On Geoengineering Activities
A select group of diabolic oligarch globalists and their puppet
cronies embedded within the United States government are now involved
in what some would say are crimes against humanity. These tyrants
will stop at nothing to usher their hush, hush global aerosol agenda
into full swing.
According to a report prepared for the Air Force titled Weather
as a Force Multiplier: Owning the WeatherBy 2025the U.S.
Air Force wants to fully control the weather on earth by the year
2025.
Far surpassing even the most horrific act of terror (real or
staged), posing as literal gods, these globalists will stop at
nothing to control the world by not only controlling the fraudulent
banking systems but by owning the weather through a process (blanket
term) called geoengineering.
According to globalist sponsored reports, our planet is in a
constant state of threat and is being bombarded with radioactive
solar rays increasing planetary temperatures due to human carbon
emissions.
However, vast bodies of research now show that is not the case and
that global warming is another globalist myth, a Ponzi scheme to
collect a Carbon Tax worldwide, benefiting the very
same group behind the curtain.
The myth the global warming “Carbon Tax” pushers have been
spouting apparently can only be fixed by spraying deadly toxins in an
aerosol particulate form into the earth’s atmosphere via large
sprayer converted aircraft specifically assigned to perform
Geoengineering tasks. Aerosol sprays (slang: Chemtrails) are filled
with a variety of chemical and metal compounds and are known to be
very hazardous to human, plant, and animal health worldwide. This
danger to plant and human and animal health has been documented in
films such as “What In the World Are They Spraying” by
Michael Murphy & G. Edward Griffin, who have also appeared on the
Intellihub Radio Show with Shepard Ambellas.
Ultimately, this issue was originally a matter for the EPA to rule
over considering that they have the authority to sanction
geoengineering activities under the National Environmental Policy ACT
of 1969. However, documents such as the report to the chairman
Committee of Science and Technology, House of
Representatives – “Climate Change” – Sept.
2010, U.S. Gov. Accountability Office which was submitted to all
members of congress in 2010 attempt to put control into the hands of
even a smaller group of people.
This report clearly is slanted and leans to take control away from
the EPA along with other regulatory provisions such as; the
Endangered Species ACT, and the Conformity Provision in the Clean Air
ACT – total Geoengineering dis-info submitted to members of the
Congress and other government branches alike.
The source of most of the dis-info is Obama’s White
House Science Czar John P. Holdren. The following was
written on USGCRP letterhead;
January 2011,
Members of Congress:
On behalf of the National
Science and Technology Council, I am transmitting a copy of Our
Changing Planet: The U.S. Global Change Research Program for Fiscal
Year 2011. The report describes the activities and plans of the
U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) established under the
Global Change Research Act (GCRA) of 1990. The USGCRP coordinates and
integrates scientific research on climate and global change and is
supported by 13 participating departments and agencies of the U.S.
government. This Fiscal Year 2011 edition of Our Changing Planet
highlights recent advances and progress made by participating
agencies and includes budget information on each agency’s
contribution.
This report describes a program
in transition. In accordance with the GCRA, the USGCRP agencies
requested guidance from the National Research Council on how to best
meet the changing needs of the nation to understand climate change
and respond to its impacts, and the NRC responded with a 2009 report
entitled “Restructuring Federal Climate Research to Meet the
Challenges of Climate Change”. In accord with that report’s
recommendations, the USGCRP is undergoing a strategic realignment
that will ensure that the science produced is maximally useful for
decision makers at all scales. As described in the new edition of Our
Changing Planet, the program going forward will place greater
emphasis on impacts, vulnerabilities, and on understanding the
options for adapting to the changing climate. The program will also
continue its long-standing support for activities that contribute to
a better understanding of the Earth system, including observations,
research, and predictive modeling.
All of these focuses will be
reflected in the USGCRP’s new strategic plan and its National
Climate Assessment.
The USGCRP is committed to its
mission to build a knowledge base that informs human responses to
global change through coordinated and integrated federal programs of
research, education, communication, and decision support. I
appreciate the close cooperation of the participating agencies, and I
look forward to working with the Congress in the continued
development and implementation of this essential national program.
Sincerely,
John P. Holdren Director,Office of Science and Technology Policy Assistant to the
President for Science and Technology” – Our Changing Planet
Even more disturbing then is the fact that your so called
representatives have been approving yearly geoengineering
budgets in the upwards of billions of dollars per year (as
outlined in the document “Our Changing Planet – The US Global
Change Research Program for the Fiscal Year of 2011, which is a
supplement to the President’s Budget for 2011, much of which is
unaccounted for and not even included in the budget possible
signifying even a more nefarious plot involving some black budget.
Back tracking to the year 2001, President elect George W. Bush
established the (CCRI) Climate Change Research Initiative. A year
later it was made public that the USGCRP or United States Global
Change Research program and the CCRI both would become what is known
as the (CCSP) Climate Change Science Program. Now, under the Obama
Administration the legacy continues to move forward as the USGCRP.
A report entitled “Global Climate Change Impacts in the United
States” released in 2009, documents how the USGCRP divided the US
into nine regions similar to FEMA regions. Also tucked into the
report was the statement “A central finding of the report was that
the vast majority of climate scientists agree that global warming is
unequivocal and primarily human induced” – Source: Our Changing
Planet.
The document goes on to mention the devastating effects of climate
change, including the effect on crops, human health and livestock.
But the most startling fact in the document is the actual budget
itself, a mere 2.7 billion for 2011 alone (not including many costs)
24% higher than 2010’s budget. The
Global Change Research ACT of 1990, SEC. 102, Committee on Earth
and Environmental Sciences states:
a) ESTABLISHMENT.–The President, through the Council, shall
establish a Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences. The
Committee shall carry out Council functions under section 401 of the
National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities
Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 6651) relating to global change research, for
the purpose of increasing the overall effectiveness and productivity
of Federal global change research efforts.
(b) MEMBERSHIP.–The Committee shall consist of at least one
representative from–
the National Science Foundation;
the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration;
the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration of the Department of Commerce;
the Environmental Protection
Agency;
the Department of Energy;
the Department of State;
the Department of Defense;
the Department of the Interior;
the Department of Agriculture;
the Department of Transportation;
the Office of Management and
Budget;
the Office of Science and
Technology Policy;
the Council on Environmental
Quality;
the National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health;
and
such other agencies and departments of the United States as
the President or the Chairman of the Council considers appropriate.
Such representatives shall be high-ranking officials of their
agency or department, wherever possible the head of the portion of
that agency or department that is most relevant to the purpose of the
title described in section 101(b).
(c) CHAIRPERSON.–The Chairman of the Council, in consultation
with the Committee, biennially shall select one of the Committee
members to serve as Chairperson. The Chairperson shall be
knowledgeable and experienced with regard to the administration of
scientific research programs, and shall be a representative of an
agency that contributes substantially, in terms of scientific
research capability and budget, to the Program.
(d) SUPPORT PERSONNEL.–An Executive Secretary shall be appointed
by the Chairperson of the
Committee, with the approval of the Committee. The Executive
Secretary shall be a permanent employee of one of the agencies or
departments represented on the Committee, and shall remain in the
employ of such agency or department. The Chairman of the Council
shall have the authority to make personnel decisions regarding any
employees detailed to the Council for purposes of working on business
of the Committee pursuant to section 401 of the National Science and
Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976 (42
U.S.C. 6651).
(e) FUNCTIONS RELATIVE TO GLOBAL CHANGE.–The Council, through
the Committee, shall be responsible for planning and coordinating the
Program. In carrying out this responsibility, the Committee shall–
serve as the forum for developing
the Plan and for overseeing its implementation;
improve cooperation among Federal
agencies and departments with respect to global change research
activities;
provide budgetary advice as
specified in section 105;
work with academic, State, industry, and other groups
conducting global change research, to
provide for periodic public and peer review of the Program;
cooperate with the Secretary of State in– (A) providing
representation at international meetings and conferences on global
change research in which the United States participates; and
(B) coordinating the Federal activities of the United States with
programs of other nations and with international global change
research activities such as the International Geosphere-Biosphere
Program;
consult with actual and potential
users of the results of the Program to ensure that such results are
useful in developing national and international policy responses to
global change; and
report at least annually to the President and the Congress,
through the Chairman of the Council, on Federal global change
research priorities, policies, and programs.”
The following is a list of the members included in the
Subcommittee on Global Change Research; SUBCOMMITTEE ON GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH Made up of the following members:
Thomas Karl -Department
of Commerce Chair
Thomas Armstrong –
Department of the Interior Vice Chair, Adaptation Research
Mike Freilich –
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Vice Chair, Integrated
Observations
Timothy Killeen –
National Science Foundation Vice Chair, Strategic Planning
William Breed -U.S.
Agency for International Development
John Balbus –
Department of Health and Human Services
William Hohenstein –
Department of Agriculture
Jack Kaye –
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Chester Koblinsky –
Department of Commerce
Linda Lawson –
Department of Transportation
Leonard Hirschn –
Smithsonian Institution
Anna Palmisano – Department of Energy
A description of the subcommittee on (p.2) Our Changing Planet
Reads;
“The USGCRP is
directed by the Subcommittee for Global Change Research (SGCR), which
falls under the National Science and Technology Council. The SGCR
comprises representatives from 13 departments and agencies and is led
by a Chair from one of the participating agencies (currently from the
Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration [NOAA]). In order to align the program’s governance
with the needs, Vice- Chairs have been identified for Strategic
Planning, Integrated Observations, and Adaptation Research.
Additional vice-chairs will be identified as needed. The program is
supported by the USGCRP Integration and Coordination Office and
conducts many of its activities through interagency working groups
that plan and implement research and crosscutting activities, such as
communications, decision support, and information and data concerns.
The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) work closely with the SGCR, the
Integration and Coordination Office, and the interagency working
groups to establish research priorities and funding plans to ensure
that the program is aligned with national priorities, reflects agency
planning, and meets the requirements of the GCRA. “ The Subcommittee in question has now supplied the
President with a supplement to the fiscal budget for 2011, which was
presented to members of congress in January of 2011 on behalf of the
National Science and Technology Policy – Assistant to the President
for Science and Technology, John P. Holdren. The (USGCRP)
brings together a total of 13 different agencies and merges them into
one single agency program that has been in the works science 1988 or
prior.
In 1990 the USGCRP received generous congressional support under
(GCRA P.L. 101-606). It is no mystery that aerosol spraying
operations have been ongoing since the early 1990’s. Prior to 1990
one could enjoy a true clear blue sky, a figment of the past in 2011
– where none are to be found.
So just how deep does the geoengineering/terraforming rabbit hole
go? The Intellihub was able to
obtain a copy of the final report prepared by the University of
Calgary under contract by Aurora Flight Sciences titled
“Geoengineering cost analysis.”
In the report there is smoking gun evidence of the entire
geoengineering saga from the secret bases, to the payload, to what
type of aircraft or “airship” will be the most cost effective to
spread toxic particulates throughout the earths atmosphere.
The final report also included budgets for different applications
for aerosol dispersal within the atmosphere. “Existing aircraft are evaluated based on cost of
acquisition and operations. An in-depth new aircraft design study and
cost analysis was conducted to determine the cost of developing and
operating a dedicated geoengineering airplane type. Similarly, an
airship design study and cost analysis was conducted. Finally a
survey of non-aircraft systems was conducted to determine how their
costs compare to aircraft and airships. Yearly costs of 1M tonne geoengineering operations for all the
systems examined are presented in Figure 2. Some systems are easily
written off due to extremely high costs. Rocket based systems are not
cost competitive due to the large number of launches required and the
impact of occasional rocket failures on required fleet size. A system
based on 16Σ” naval Mark 7 guns was analyzed and compared to
previous work by the National Research Council.4 This system requires
large numbers of shots increasing projectile costs and driving yearly
costs over $100B. Gun costs become more competitive if the projectile
payload fraction can be increased from about 10% for a standard shell
to 50%. With this and a few improvements over the 1940-era Mark 7 gun
yearly costs are still in the $20B range….The primary vehicles
examined to lift particulate to stratospheric altitudes and disperse
them at a predetermined release rate are airplanes and airships;
rockets and other non- aircraft methods such as guns and suspended
pipes are also surveyed.” –Aurora
Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final Report (p.5) “Geoengineering may provide a means to create a time buffer
against catastrophic cli- mate change while long-term emissions
reduction actions take effect. One approach is to disperse sulfur
compounds at high altitude to reduce the effective solar flux
entering the atmosphere. This report will evaluate the means of
delivering sufficient mass of this or similar material to affect
climate change on a global scale. The goal of this study is to use
engineering design and cost analysis to determine the feasibility and
cost of a delivering material to the stratosphere for solar radiation
management (SRM). This study does notexamine
effectiveness or risks of injecting material into the stratosphere
for SRM. Its goal is simply to
compare a range of delivery systems on a single cost basis.” –
Aurora
Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final Report (p.6) The report
mentions how payload costs are not included in the estimate nor are
the base/facility costs and continues on (p.8) to say; “This study focuses on airplane and airship operations to
the stratosphere to release a geoengineering payload with the goal of
reducing incoming solar flux. Airships are also considered for this
mission. To provide a comparison to conventional aircraft operations,
more exotic concepts such as rockets, guns, and suspended pipes are
also examined….For maximum cooling impact, the particulate payloads
are best placed near the equator. This study assumes that the payload
is released within latitudes 30°N and 30°S, though North-South
basing location had minimal effect on cost. Transit operations,
flying East- West between equally spaced bases around the equator,
were examined as a method to ensure adequate dispersal of the payload
around the equator. Global winds aid in East-West dispersal so a
smaller number of bases and shorter range systems (referred to as
Regional operations) can be employed with minimal impact on
dispersal. Region- al operations allow the dispersal leg length to be
dictated by the desired release rate of 0.03kg/m flown. This means
the airplanes fly no further than they have to, on the order of
300-800 km, and fuel costs are minimized.” – Aurora Flight
Sciences: Geoengineering Final report Yearly cost estimates from
different dispersal methods ranged from over 1 billion dollars a year
all the way up to rocket dispersed aerosol in the upper atmosphere at
the cost of over 100 billion dollars per year. Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los
Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is
especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from
beyond whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very
existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with
world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man
fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual
rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their
well-being granted to them by their world government.” – Henry
Kissinger in an address to the Bilderbergers at Evian, France, May
21, 1992.
Update – March 31, 2011:
Aluminum resistant gene patent #
7582809
Patent granted on September 1,
2009
Patent developed at the Robert W.
Holley Center for Agricultural Health at Cornell University in
Ithaca, NY.
Leon Kochian and Jurandir Vieira
de Magallhaes are the primary inventors/ researchers
Patent assigned to US Department
of Agriculture and Brazilian Enterprise for Agricultural Research
According to Cornell University Chronicle Online, the
research project was supported in part by the McKnight Foundation
Collaborative Crop Research Program, the Generation Challenge
Program, the National Science Foundation and the USDA.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a contributor to both the
McKnight Foundation and the Generation Challenge Program.
Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation,
Contrails and Chemtrails
By Rady Ananda At
an international symposium held in Ghent, Belgium May 28-30, 2010,
scientists asserted that “manipulation of climate through
modification of Cirrus clouds is neither a hoax nor a conspiracy
theory.” It is “fully operational” with a solid sixty-year
history. Though “hostile” environmental modification was banned
by UN Convention in 1978, its “friendly” use today is being
hailed as the new savior to climate change and to water and food
shortages. The military-industrial complex stands poised to
capitalize on controlling the world’s weather. “In recent years there has been a decline in the support for
weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into
operational projects.” ~World Meteorological Organization,
2007
Rainmaker Charles Hatfield, in 1915, destroyed much of San Diego.
The only conspiracy surrounding geoengineering is that most
governments and industry refuse to publicly admit what anyone with
eyes can see. Peer-reviewed research is available to anyone willing
and able to maneuver the labyrinth of scientific journals. So, while
there is some disclosure on the topic, full public explanation is
lacking. A brief list of confirmed cloud seeding events is produced
at bottom, starting in 1915.
Going under a variety of names – atmospheric geoengineering,
weather modification, solar radiation management, chemical buffering,
cloud seeding, weather force multiplication – toxic aerial spraying
is popularly known as chemtrails. However, this is merely one
technique employed to modify weather. The practice of environmental
modification is vast and well funded.
Hosted by the Belfort Group, which has been working for the last
seven years to raise public awareness of toxic aerial spraying, the
Symposium included chemtrail awareness groups from Greece, Germany,
Holland, France and the U.S. Belfort published five videos covering
only May 29,[1] when filmmaker Michael Murphy (Environmental
Deception and What in the world are they spraying)[2] and aerospace
engineer Dr. Coen Vermeeren [3] gave the most dramatic presentations.
Dr Vermeeren, of the Delft University of Technology, presented [4]
a 300-page scientific report entitled, “CASE ORANGE: Contrail
Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs
Conducted by the United States and Its Allies.” [5]
Case Orange notes it was prepared for the Belfort Group by a team
of scientists but presented anonymously. It was sent to embassies,
news organizations and interested groups around the world “to force
public debate.”
The report spends some time on HAARP, the High Frequency Active
Auroral Research Program, [6] which is a military endeavor focused on
ionospheric, electromagnetic, and global electrostatic field
manipulation, and on other exotic weapon systems that manipulate the
environment. While related, they go beyond this discussion of
chemtrails.
In the interest of brevity, the health and environmental
implications of cloud seeding is not discussed in any depth herein.
Case Orange does go into it, as did most of the speakers at the
Belfort Symposium. Cursory research reveals a debate among
researchers as to chemtrail toxicity, but whether that’s a 50-50 or
99-1 argument is unknown. Contrails Are Chemtrails
Case Orange rejects use of the term ‘chemtrails’ because it is
associated with amateur conspiracy theorists. The only credible
document it could find that uses it is the Space Preservation Act of
2001 introduced by U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH). [7]
H.R. 2977 sought to ban the use of exotic weapon systems that would
damage climate, weather, tectonic and biological systems.
“Chemtrails” are specifically listed. Though later removed, no
version of the bill ever became law.
Instead, the writers prefer the term ‘persistent contrails’ to
describe the phenomenon since all contrails are chemtrails.
‘Persistent contrails’ distinguishes those that contain
weather-altering additives from those that represent normal aircraft
exhaust that dissipates after a few seconds or minutes.
Case Orange also rejects misanthropic intentions behind persistent
contrails. It shows that geoengineering is fully operational, but
rejects it is used to sicken people on the assumptions that 1) public
health agencies have the public interest at heart; and 2) the economy
is consumer driven. The authors indicate no awareness of numerous
reports of collusion between the pharmaceutical industry and
government health agencies. This year, a significant
conflict-of-interest report appeared in the prestigious British
Medical Journal, which further heightened suspicions that the H1N1
flu and its vaccines were a scam.[8] Nor do the authors consider
that sick people will spur economic growth in a capitalist (for
profit) health system.
Dr. Vermeeren gave his own introductory remarks and conclusions,
but spent the bulk of the hour presenting information from Case
Orange. He frankly admitted the existence of persistent contrails.
“We also know that chemtrails do exist because we do spraying;
for crops, for example, and we know that they have been spraying for
military purposes. So, chemtrails is nothing new. We know about it.” Video streaming by Ustream
Dr
Coen Vermeeren Symposium speech http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427
Part 1 video, (starting at about 35 mins.) (29 May 2010)
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427 “Weather manipulation through contrail formation … is
in place and fully operational.”
Case Orange cites publicly available material that shows
geoengineering has been ongoing for “at least 60 years.” Used as
a weapon of war in Hamburg by the UK during World War II, it was also
used in the Vietnam Conflict by the US. Controversy over its use,
revealed by investigative reporter Jack Anderson, spurred Senate
hearings in 1972. During those hearings, military officials denied
the use of cloud seeding technology. Later, a private letter from
Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird admitting that his testimony was
false surfaced. He, again unbelievably, claimed he didn’t know what
was happening. [9]
Environmental modification (EnMod) weaponry was finally banned by
treaty in 1978. The UN Convention on the Prohibition of Military or
Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques forced
the end of such programs, overtly anyway.[10] (Case Orange authors
seem unaware of this international ban, as it is one of their
recommendations.)
However, with widespread reporting of rising global temperatures,
increasing population, and degradation of water supplies, renewed
interest in EnMod is now becoming broadly supported. (See, e.g., Top
economists recommend climate engineering, 4 Sep 2009 [11] and
similarly, Top science body calls for geoengineering ‘plan B’, 1
Sep 2009.[12]) The
crew in Operation Stormfury in 1963. Note the special belly on the
Douglas DC6-B for cloud seeding purposes. (From Case Orange)
Building a case for old technology finding a new market, Case
Orange discusses several U.S. patents. For example, authors describe
a 1975 patent, “Powder Contrail Generation,” [13] for the
invention of a: “specific contrail generation apparatus for producing a
powder contrail having maximum radiation scattering ability for a
given weight [of] material. The seeding material … consists of 85%
metallic particles and 15% colloidal Silica and Silica gel in order
to produce a stable contrail that has a residence period of 1 up to 2
weeks.”
In 2009, researchers published “Modification of Cirrus clouds to
reduce global warming,” which proposed two methods of delivery for
this same proportion of metallics to silica and the same staying
power of one to two weeks.[14]
Case Orange also reveals a 1991 patent held by Hughes Aircraft
Company [15] that:
“contains 18 claims to reduce global warming through
stratospheric seeding with aluminum oxide… thorium oxide … and
refractory Welsbach material ….”
The report notes that “the proposed scenario by the IPCC
[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] in 2001 is identical to
the claims” in Hughes Aircraft’s 1991 patent. Hughes was acquired
by Raytheon, a private defense contractor, in 1997, “the same
company that acquired E-systems and the HAARP contract.”
Case Orange presents evidence that Raytheon stands to control all
weather, which the authors find repugnant given that it is a private
corporation. The authors recommend suing private corporations instead
of governments. But subcontracting is quite common for governments
and agencies, especially the US military. The distinction between
large, powerful corporations and governments is a fine line obscure
to common folk. And, the effect is the same whether governments are
spraying us with nano-sized metals, chemicals or biologicals, or
whether corporations do. The authors’ protective posture toward
governments is nonsensical.
Case Orange suggests that geoengineering found new life in the
global warming scare. Old patents are being dusted off and private
interests stand to make substantial sums now that Cap and Trade has
been exposed as ineffective in reducing greenhouse gases. (Although,
lawmakers are still considering it since substantial sums can be made
from the scheme, to wit: Al Gore reportedly achieved billionaire
status from it.)
Since 2007, billionaire Bill Gates has spent at least $4.5 million
on geoengineering research. [16] Since reducing emissions is not
popular with industry, ‘Plan B’ – geoengineering – is being
touted as the answer to climate change and water shortage. A longer
description of Plan B is: Add more pollution to the sky and water to
offset industrial pollution, without reducing industrial pollution.
Human rights and environmental watchdog, ETC Group, describes the
momentum [17]:
“The roll-out of geoengineering as Plan B is being skillfully
executed: prominent high-level panels sponsored by prestigious
groups, a spate of peer-reviewed articles this January in science
journals, and a line-up of panicked politicians in northern
countries, nodding nervously in agreement as scientists testify about
the ‘need to research Plan B.’”
ETC reports that Gates’ top geoengineering advisor unveiled a
plan to grow solar radiation management research “one-hundred-fold,
from $10 million to $1 billion over ten years.”
Indeed, several watchdog groups recently ramped up calls to
address clean water shortage. “At the end of July 2010, the United
Nations General Assembly will vote on an important resolution,
initiated by the Bolivian government, which would make clean water
and sanitation a human right,” reports Food and Water Watch.[18] Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 Case
Orange ties a 1996 report by top military personnel in the U.S.,
“Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” [19]
to evidentiary details (like governmental spraying schedules,
chemical orders, correct nomenclature used in airline operating
manuals, and calls for geoengineering by economists) to support its
notion of “heavy involvement of governments at top level in climate
control projects.”
Owning the Weather in 2025 provides a specific timeline for the
use of EnMod technologies in cooperation with the Weather
Modification Association (WMA), a business-government group promoting
the beneficial uses of environmental modification [20]:
2000 Introduce ionic mirrors, with a sharp increase from 2008;
2000-2025 Use chemicals for atmospheric seeding by civilian (as
well as military) aviation;
2004 Create smart clouds thru nanotechnology, with exponential
increase after 2010;
2005 Introduce ‘carbon black dust’.
Though Case Orange decries the paucity of research into EnMod, in
2009 WMA published its position statement on the safety of seeding
clouds with silver-iodide, citing three dozen research papers from
1970 through 2006. [21] In 2007, the World Meteorological
Organization (WMO) published a statement that included “Guidelines
for the Planning of Weather Modification Activities.” Acknowledging
that the modern technology of weather modification began in the
1940s, it is still “an emerging technology” today. [22] WMO
indicated disappointment that research is being abandoned for
operations.
Case Orange contains no reference to the WMA position statement
citing all that research, although it cites the group. Nor does it
mention the World Meteorological Organization, an agency of the
United Nations, which has a link to its Weather Modification portal
on its Index page.
At the end of the section, The bare necessity of geoengineering
through cloud generation for survival of the planet (5.2.7), Case
Orange states:
“[O]ur investigation team comes to the conclusion that climate
control programs, controlled by the military but approved by
governments, are silently implemented in order to avoid the worst
case scenarios they obviously do not want. The two basic instruments
are temperature control through generation of artificial clouds and
manipulation of the ionosphere through ionosphere heaters.
“Both remain basically military combat systems with the option
to go into the offensive if deemed necessary. However since several
ionosphere heaters are installed on various places around the globe
one can assume that there is wide cooperation between governments in
order to reach the climate targets by 2025: controlling the weather
and thus the planet.”
The report published the following images provided by a former
meteorologist at the Ontario Weather Service, showing spraying
schemes for Europe. For December 6, 2008:
“The spraying schemes seem to be organized in a logical pattern
so that the whole of Europe is covered in a 3-day period,” the
authors write. The images cover January 3-5, 2010:
Case Orange agrees that climate change needs to be addressed.
Regarding Climate-Gate, the authors suggest that the University of
East Anglia deliberately manipulated the climate data to gradually
prepare the global population for its future on a hotter planet.
They also cite research that supports the notion that climate
change is real. During the three-day grounding of most aircraft after
9/11, scientists noticed an increase in temperature of 1.1 °C (2
°F). [23] This is an astounding increase in such a short time frame.
The incidence of cloud seeding reports by the public increases
exponentially after this.
The 1996 military piece, Owning the Weather in 2025, gives climate
change skeptics “an insight in what to expect in the 21st century:
‘Current demographic, economic and environmental trends will
create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many
countries or groups to turn weather modfication ability into
capability. In the United States weather modification will likely
become part of national security policy with both domestic and
international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy,
depending on its interests, at various levels.’” Recommendations
“Persistent contrails,” however, “have a devastating impact
on eco-systems on this planet and quality of life in general.” Case
Orange joins the call of Bill Gates’ geoengineering advisor and the
WMO for new research measuring the impact on human health and the
environment from EnMod programs.
Case Orange also recommends an immediate and full disclosure of
current EnMod activities to the public; and that all civil aviation
laws be abided.
Of note, in response to policy interest in geoengineering as a
means to control climate change and enhance water supplies, on May
14, 2010, the science subcommittee of the United Nations Convention
on Biological Diversity proposed a geoengineering moratorium. [24]
This proposed ban on “friendly” EnMod programs will be heard at
the Tenth Conference of Parties to UN Convention on Biodiversity in
Nagoya, Japan this October.
Case Orange reports that China and Russia openly admit to
cloud-seeding, while the U.S. denies such activities. The U.S. does
permit open air testing of chemical and biological weapons but not
under the law the authors cited, which they paraphrased:
The secretary of defense may conduct tests and experiments
involving the use of chemical and biological agents on civilian
populations.
Public law of the United States, Law 95-79, Title VIII, Sec. 808,
July 30, 1977.
Codified as 50 USC 1520, under Chapter 32 Chemical and Biological
Warfare Program, Public Law 85-79 was repealed in 1997 by Public Law
105-85. In its place, 15 USC 1520a provides restrictions (such as
informed consent). 50 USC 1512, however, allows open air testing of
chemicals and biologicals and allows presidential override of notices
and of public health considerations for national security reasons.
[25] Case Orange authors are thus correct in asserting that such
programs are legal in the U.S. Epilogue
Having heard enough conspiracy theories to last me a lifetime, I
hesitated researching the subject of chemtrails, and maintained
skepticism. That all changed in March when I personally observed two
jets seeding clouds, along with about 30 other people in the parking
lot at lunchtime. Someone took a picture from her cell phone: The
trails lasted for hours, and looked distinctly different from other
clouds. Since then, I’ve been watching the skies and can now tell
when they’ve been seeded. We often have a white haze instead of a
deep blue sky, even when persistent contrails aren’t visible.
A few days ago, someone sent me a link to the Belfort Symposium
videos. Four hours into it, I became riveted when Dr. Vermeeren began
his presentation of the Case Orange report. That’s when I decided
to seriously look into the subject. As informative as Case Orange is
for the newcomer, any serious research into the subject reveals that
what all those “conspiracy theorists” suggest is true: they are
spraying the skies, and they’re not telling us.
Discovering that the World Meteorological Organization has a tab
on its website called Weather Modification shocked me. Reading their
disappointment that governments are going ahead with operations
instead of doing more research confirmed all of it for me. And that
was published in 2007!
So, while we’re not being told, the information is publicly
available to any armchair researcher.
Being so late to the game on all this accords me sympathy for
others. Military leaders have for centuries recognized that it rains
after a heavy battle, but harnessing that power in a way that doesn’t
cause a deluge like in San Diego in 1915 has been a task. I came upon
other stories like that in my research – misdirected hurricanes,
farm wars, massive flooding and mudslides. It’s no wonder there are
so many books on the subject. It’s no wonder this turned into a
3,000-word essay.
Chemtrails are no hoax; I spent time going to as many original
sources as I could find. The record is replete with mainstream news
accounts of the early days of the modern EnMod program. If its birth
can be marked by Britain’s successful use of chaff in 1943 to jam
enemy radar, the program is 67 years old. That’s quite a history to
keep under the radar of most people. That reflects most poorly on
mainstream news sources, who are supposed to expose government
shenanigans.
~~~ A Brief History of Cloud Seeding
Cloud seeding, as a US military research project, began as early
as the 1830s, according to Colby College professor, James R. Fleming.
[26] Verifiably successful rainmaking attempts did not occur until
1915.
1915 To end a prolonged drought, San Diego hired reputed rainmaker
Charles Hatfield, who claimed that the evaporation of his secret
chemical brew atop wooden towers could attract clouds. San Diego was
rewarded with a 17-day deluge that totaled 28 inches. The deadly
downpour washed out more than 100 bridges, made roads impassable over
a huge area, destroyed communications lines, and left thousands
homeless. [27]
Charles Hatfield’s rain washes out dam 1915, San Diego. Dozens
died.
1943 “The first operational use of chaff (aluminium strips which
are precisely cut to a quarter of the radar’s wavelength) took
place in July 1943, when Hamburg was subjected to a devastating
bombing raid. The radar screens were cluttered with reflections from
the chaff and the air defence was, in effect, completely blinded.”
[28]
1946 General Electric’s Vincent Schaefer dropped six pounds of
dry ice into a cold cloud over Greylock Peak in the Berkshires,
causing an “explosive” growth of three miles in the cloud. [29]
New York dry ice seeding 1946 (Life Magazine)
1947 Australian meteorologists successfully repeated the process.
[30]
1949 Project Cirrus: Nobel Laureate Irving Langmuir and General
Electric researcher Vincent Schaefer fed ten ounces of silver iodide
into a blowtorch apparatus and brought down 320 billion gallons of
rain across half of New Mexico from a desert near Albuquerque. [31]
1950 Harvard meteorologist Wallace Howell seeded New York City
skies with dry ice and silver iodide smoke, filling the city’s
reservoirs to near capacity. [32]
1952 The UK’s Operation Cumulus resulted in 250 times the normal
amount of rainfall, killing dozens and destroying landscapes. [33]
1962-1983 Operation Stormfury, a hurricane modification program,
had some success in reducing winds by up to 30%. [34]
1966-1972 Project Intermediary Compatriot (later called Pop Eye)
successfully seeded clouds in Laos. The technique became part of
military actions in Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos from 1967 to 1972.
Initially revealed by Jack Anderson in the Washington Post, 18 Mar
1971. [35]
1986 The Soviet air force diverted Chernobyl fallout from reaching
Moscow by seeding clouds. Belarus, instead, was hit. [36]
China weather rocket (2008 by ImpactLab)
2008 Chinese government used 1,104 cloud seeding missiles to
remove the threat of rain ahead of the Olympic opening ceremony in
Beijing. [37]
2009 Moscow Halo. Case Orange cites this as evidence
of cloud seeding, but others suspect it is electromagnetic in origin.
Russian authorities said it was an optical illusion. [38]
This is by no means a comprehensive list; indeed, volumes are
dedicated to the subject. Notes:
[1] Belfort Group videos of International Symposium on Chemtrails,
May 29, 2010 proceedings. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/belfort-test
[2] Michael Murphy website:
http://truthmediaproductions.blogspot.com/
[3] Dr Coen Vermeeren, Delft University of Technology bio, n.d.
[4] Dr Coen Vermeeren Symposium speech, Afternoon Part 1 video,
(starting at about 35 mins..) (29 May 2010)
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427
[5] Anonymous, “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on
Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United
States and Its Allies,” 10 May 2010. PDF without
appendices: http://coto2.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/case_orange-5-10-2010-belfort-chemtrails.pdf
[6] High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, Fact Sheet, 15
Jun 2007. http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/factSheet.html
[7] Space
Preservation Act of 2001, H.R.2977, 107th Congress, 1st Session.
Introduced by U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich.
[8] Deborah Cohen and Philip Carter, “Conflicts of Interest: WHO
and the pandemic ‘flu conspiracies,’” British Medical Journal
2010;340:c2912, 3 Jun 2010.
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/340/jun03_4/c2912
[9] The Sunshine Project, “The Limits of Inside Pressure: The US
Congress Role in ENMOD,” n.d. Accessed July 2010.
http://www.sunshine-project.org/enmod/US_Congr.html
[10] United Nations, “Convention on the Prohibition of Military
or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques,”
Resolution 31/72, 10 Dec 1976, effective 1978. Geneva.
http://www.un-documents.net/enmod.htm
[11] Copenhagen Consensus Center, “Top economists recommend
climate engineering,” 4 Sep 2009. Press release
[pdf] http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2fPress+Releases+2010%2fCC_PRESS_STATEMENT__4september2010_.pdf
[12] Catherine Brahic, “Top science body calls for
geoengineering ‘plan B’, New Scientist 1 Sep
2009. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17716-top-science-body-calls-for-geoengineering-plan-b.html
[13] Donald K. Werle, et al., “Powder contrail generation,”
U.S. Patent 3,899,144, 12 Aug 1975. Assignee: U.S. Secretary of the
Navy. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=3,899,144.PN.&OS=PN/3,899,144&RS=PN/3,899,144
[14] David L Mitchell and William Finnegan, “Modification of
Cirrus clouds to reduce global warming,” Environmental Research
Letters Vol. 4 No. 4, 30 Oct 2009. Available by subscription:
http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/4/4/045102
[15] David B. Chang and I-Fu Shih, “Stratospheric Welsbach
seeding for reduction of global warming,” U.S. Patent 5,003,186, 26
Mar 1991. Assignee: Hughes Aircraft
Company. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,003,186.PN.&OS=PN/5,003,186&RS=PN/5,003,186
[16] Eli Kintisch, “Bill Gates Funding Geoengineering Research,”
Science Insider, 26 Jan 2010.
http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/01/bill-gates-fund.html.
[17] ETC Group, “Top-down Planet Hackers Call for Bottom-up
Governance: Geoengineers’ Bid to Establish Voluntary Testing Regime
Must Be Opposed,” 11 Feb 2010. http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/5073
[18] Food and Water Watch:
http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/water/world-water/right/
[19] Col Tamzy J. House, et al. “Weather as a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather in 2025,” Department of Defense U.S. Air Force,
17 Jun 1996. Publicly released August 1996. Reproduced at Federation
of American
Scientists: http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2025/v3c15/v3c15-1.htm
[20] Weather Modicaton Association website:
http://www.weathermodification.org/
[21] Weather Modification Association, “Position Statement on
the Environmental Impact of Using Silver Iodides as a Cloud Seeding
Agent,” July
2009. http://www.weathermodification.org/AGI_toxicity.pdf
[22] World Meteorological Organization, “WMO Statement on
Weather Modification,” UN Commission for Atmospheric Sciences
Management Group, 26 Sep
2007. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/WM_statement_guidelines_approved.pdf
[23] Donald J. Travis, et al. “Contrails reduce daily
temperature range,” Nature 418, 601, 8 Aug 2002. Reproduced in full
by University of Washington, Dept. of Atmospheric
Sciences: http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~rennert/etc/courses/pcc587/ref/Travis-etal2002_Nature.pdf
[24] Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological
Advice, “In-depth Review of the Work on Biodiversity and Climate
Change, Draft Recommendation,” Convention on Biological Diversity,
United Nations Environmental Programme, UNEP/CBD/SBTTA/14/L.9, 15 May
2010.
http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-14/in-session/sbstta-14-L-09-en.pdf
[25] United States Code, Title 50, Chapter 32, “Chemical and
Biological Warfare Program.”
http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/50C32.txt
[26] James Rodger Fleming, “The pathological history of weather
and climate modification: Three cycles of promise and hype,”
Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, Vol. 37,
No. 1, 2006. Available
at http://www.colby.edu/sts/06_fleming_pathological.pdf
[27] Stephen Cole, “Weather on Demand,” American Heritage,
2005.
http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/2005/2/2005_2_48.shtml
[28] Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese, “The History of Radar,”
BBC, 14 Jul 2003. http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A591545
[29] Fleming, citing New York Times, 15 Nov 1946, 24.
[30] Squires, P. & Smith, E. J., “The Artificial Stimulation
of Precipitation by Means of Dry Ice,” Australian Journal of
Scientific Research, Series A: Physical Sciences, vol. 2, p.232,
1949AuSRA…2..232S, 1949. Republished at Harvard
University: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1949AuSRA…2..232S/0000244.000.html
Also see: Stephen Cole, “Weather on Demand,” American
Heritage,
2005. http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/2005/2/2005_2_48.shtml
[31] Life Magazine, “Solution to Water Shortage: Rain makers’
success shows how New York could fill its reservoirs,” p. 113, 20
Feb
1950. http://books.google.com/books?id=FVMEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA113&dq=Irving+Langmuir&as_pt=MAGAZINES&cd=1#v=onepage&q=Irving%20Langmuir&f=false
[32] Life Magazine, “U.S. Water: We can supplement our outgrown
sources at a price,” 21 Aug 1950, p.
52. http://books.google.com/books?id=wUoEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA52&lpg=PA52&dq=Irving+Langmuir+rainmaker&source=bl&ots=Ehqq8hZNsE&sig= tkN51NoxqMsKVq6ClZU9Hvej8g0&hl=en&ei=9mhMTO3vG93llQfjpJHGDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CCIQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q&f=false
[33] John Vidal and Helen Weinstein, “RAF rainmakers ’caused
1952 flood’: Unearthed documents suggest experiment triggered
torrent that killed 35 in Devon disaster,” The Guardian, 30 Aug
2001. http://www.guardian.co.uk/silly/story/0,10821,544259,00.html
Also see: BBC News, “Rain-making link to killer floods,” 30
Aug 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1516880.stm
[34] Jerry E. Smith, “Weather Warfare: The Military’s Plan to
Draft Mother Nature,” Adventures Unlimited Press, 2006. pp.
47-54. http://books.google.com/books?id=G7t260XD8AYC&pg=PA47&dq=stormfury&hl=en&ei=9wJ OTOfVE4G88gbZ3IGaDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=stormfury&f=false
[35] ibid. pp. 54-60.
[36] Richard Gray, “How we made the Chernobyl rain,” Daily
Telegraph, 22 Apr
2007. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1549366/How-we-made-the-Chernobyl-rain.html
[37] Ian O’Neill, “The Chinese Weather Manipulation Missile
Olympics,” Universe Today, 12 Aug
2008. http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/12/the-chinese-weather-manipulation-missile-olympics/
[38] Anonymous, “Moscow Halo,” cell phone video uploaded to
YouTube, 7 Oct 2009. reposted at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXF9HSB627U globalresearch.ca
We can mitigate the effects of any chemicals and neutralized all
types of parasites without using drugs or expensive procedures, but
only with a very simple and complete
protocol that defeats all known and unknown diseases for good,
without any long-term side-effects. Find more about it here.
At
an international symposium held in Ghent, Belgium May 28-30, 2010,
scientists asserted that “manipulation of climate through
modification of Cirrus clouds is neither a hoax nor a conspiracy
theory.” It is “fully operational” with a solid sixty-year
history. Though “hostile” environmental modification was banned
by UN Convention in 1978, its “friendly” use today is being
hailed as the new savior to climate change and to water and food
shortages. The military-industrial complex stands poised to
capitalize on controlling the world’s weather.
The
crew in Operation Stormfury in 1963. Note the special belly on the
Douglas DC6-B for cloud seeding purposes. (From Case Orange)
Case
Orange ties a 1996 report by top military personnel in the U.S.,
“Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” [19]
to evidentiary details (like governmental spraying schedules,
chemical orders, correct nomenclature used in airline operating
manuals, and calls for geoengineering by economists) to support its
notion of “heavy involvement of governments at top level in climate
control projects.”
The
trails lasted for hours, and looked distinctly different from other
clouds. Since then, I’ve been watching the skies and can now tell
when they’ve been seeded. We often have a white haze instead of a
deep blue sky, even when persistent contrails aren’t visible.