Leen continued saying that a “common law or First Amendment right”
for the press and the public to access the government’s pretrial
evidence does not exist, though all information obtained through “open
sources” such as the internet or social media would be accessible.
Ammon Bundy’s attorney, Dan Hill, was not pleased with the judge’s decision.
“It”s unfortunate that so much information is going to be kept from
the public in this case. Ammon Bundy has never hidden anything and now
the government wants to prosecute him in secret. I will continue to
fight for justice in this case despite the government’s effort to keep
information hidden,” he said.
Chris Rasmussen, the attorney for defendant Pete Santilli, shared
Hill’s opinion and says he plans to file an appeal on behalf of his
client.
“He wants this trial to be open to the public, and he wants the
public to see all of the evidence so that he can prove his innocence,”
he said.
Maggie McLetchie — an attorney who represents the Las Vegas
Review-Journal, Battle Born Media and The Associated Press — said she
was disappointed with the judge’s decision.
“From the media’s perspective, the order still cloaks much of the
information about this case in secrecy despite the heightened need for
transparency the judge recognized when allowing the media to intervene,”
McLetchie said. “It is deeply troubling that so many documents will be
automatically hidden from public view.”
The trial is currently set for Feb. 6 in U.S. District Court.
h/t:
Las Vegas Review Journal
http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/judge-makes-stunning-ruling-in-bundy-case/
No comments:
Post a Comment