The current debate on climate change
happening around the world at the moment refuses to acknowledge
‘climatic warfare’ in its potential leading role in threatening
the future of humanity.
Climatic warfare is the deliberate modification of the climate for
military use, using weather modification systems such as HAARP.
“HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction, capable of
destabilising agricultural and ecological systems globally.”
As world leaders gather at the COP21 conference in Paris this
week, why has this subject been excluded from the agenda?
Globalresearch.ca
reports:
Rarely acknowledged in the debate on global climate change,
the world’s weather can now be modified as part of a new generation
of sophisticated electromagnetic weapons. Both the US and Russia have
developed capabilities to manipulate the climate for military use.
Environmental modification techniques have been applied by the US
military for more than half a century. US mathematician John von
Neumann, in liaison with the US Department of Defense, started his
research on weather modification in the late 1940s at the height of
the Cold War and foresaw ‘forms of climatic warfare as yet
unimagined’. During the Vietnam war, cloud-seeding techniques were
used, starting in 1967 under Project Popeye, the objective of which
was to prolong the monsoon season and block enemy supply routes along
the Ho Chi Minh Trail.
The US military has developed advanced capabilities that enable it
selectively to alter weather patterns. The technology, which is being
perfected under the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program
(HAARP), is an appendage of the Strategic Defense Initiative –
‘Star Wars’. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of
mass destruction, operating from the outer atmosphere and capable of
destabilising agricultural and ecological systems around the world.
Weather-modification, according to the US Air Force document AF
2025 Final Report, ‘offers the war fighter a wide range of possible
options to defeat or coerce an adversary’, capabilities, it says,
extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes, droughts and
earthquakes: ‘Weather modification will become a part of domestic
and international security and could be done unilaterally… It could
have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for
deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog and
storms on earth or to modify space weather… and the production of
artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of [military]
technologies.’
In 1977, an international Convention was ratified by the UN
General Assembly which banned ‘military or other hostile use of
environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting
or severe effects.’ It defined ‘environmental modification
techniques’ as ‘any technique for changing –through the
deliberate manipulation of natural processes – the dynamics,
composition or structure of the earth, including its biota,
lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space.’
While the substance of the 1977 Convention was reasserted in the
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) signed at the 1992
Earth Summit in Rio, debate on weather modification for military use
has become a scientific taboo.
Military analysts are mute on the subject. Meteorologists are not
investigating the matter and environmentalists are focused on
greenhouse gas emissions under the Kyoto Protocol. Neither is the
possibility of climatic or environmental manipulations as part of a
military and intelligence agenda, while tacitly acknowledged, part of
the broader debate on climate change under UN auspices.
The HAARP Programme
Established in 1992, HAARP, based in Gokona, Alaska, is an array
of high-powered antennas that transmit, through high-frequency radio
waves, massive amounts of energy into the ionosphere (the upper layer
of the atmosphere). Their construction was funded by the US Air
Force, the US Navy and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA). Operated jointly by the Air Force Research Laboratory and
the Office of Naval Research, HAARP constitutes a system of powerful
antennas capable of creating ‘controlled local modifications of the
ionosphere’. According to its official website,
www.haarp.alaska.edu
, HAARP will be used ‘to induce a small, localized change in
ionospheric temperature so physical reactions can be studied by other
instruments located either at or close to the HAARP site’.
But Rosalie Bertell, president of the International Institute of
Concern for Public Health, says HAARP operates as ‘a gigantic
heater that can cause major disruptions in the ionosphere, creating
not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer that keeps
deadly radiation from bombarding the planet’.
Physicist Dr Bernard Eastlund called it ‘the largest ionospheric
heater ever built’. HAARP is presented by the US Air Force as a
research programme, but military documents confirm its main objective
is to ‘induce ionospheric modifications’ with a view to altering
weather patterns and disrupting communications and radar.
According to a report by the Russian State Duma: ‘The US plans
to carry out large-scale experiments under the HAARP programme [and]
create weapons capable of breaking radio communication lines and
equipment installed on spaceships and rockets, provoke serious
accidents in electricity networks and in oil and gas pipelines, and
have a negative impact on the mental health of entire regions.’*
An analysis of statements emanating from the US Air Force points
to the unthinkable: the covert manipulation of weather patterns,
communications and electric power systems as a weapon of global
warfare, enabling the US to disrupt and dominate entire regions.
Weather manipulation is the pre-emptive weapon par excellence. It can
be directed against enemy countries or ‘friendly nations’ without
their knowledge, used to destabilise economies, ecosystems and
agriculture. It can also trigger havoc in financial and commodity
markets. The disruption in agriculture creates a greater dependency
on food aid and imported grain staples from the US and other Western
countries.
HAARP was developed as part of an Anglo-American partnership
between Raytheon Corporation, which owns the HAARP patents, the US
Air Force and British Aerospace Systems (BAES).
The HAARP project is one among several collaborative ventures in
advanced weapons systems between the two defence giants. The HAARP
project was initiated in 1992 by Advanced Power Technologies, Inc.
(APTI), a subsidiary of Atlantic Richfield Corporation (ARCO). APTI
(including the HAARP patents) was sold by ARCO to E-Systems Inc, in
1994. E-Systems, on contract to the CIA and US Department of Defense,
outfitted the ‘Doomsday Plan’, which ‘allows the President to
manage a nuclear war’.Subsequently acquired by Raytheon
Corporation, it is among the largest intelligence contractors in the
World. BAES was involved in the development of the advanced stage of
the HAARP antenna array under a 2004 contract with the Office of
Naval Research.
The installation of 132 high frequency transmitters was entrusted
by BAES to its US subsidiary, BAE Systems Inc. The project, according
to a July report in Defense News, was undertaken by BAES’s
Electronic Warfare division. In September it received DARPA’s top
award for technical achievement for the design, construction and
activation of the HAARP array of antennas.
The HAARP system is fully operational and in many regards dwarfs
existing conventional and strategic weapons systems. While there is
no firm evidence of its use for military purposes, Air Force
documents suggest HAARP is an integral part of the militarisation of
space. One would expect the antennas already to have been subjected
to routine testing.
Under the UNFCCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) has a mandate ‘to assess scientific, technical and
socioeconomic information relevant for the understanding of climate
change’. This mandate includes environmental warfare.
‘Geo-engineering’ is acknowledged, but the underlying military
applications are neither the object of policy analysis or scientific
research in the thousands of pages of IPCC reports and supporting
documents, based on the expertise and input of some 2,500 scientists,
policymakers and environmentalists. ‘Climatic warfare’
potentially threatens the future of humanity, but has casually been
excluded from the reports for which the IPCC received the 2007 Nobel
Peace Prize.
http://yournewswire.com/climatic-warfare-is-real-but-ignored-in-climate-change-debate/